Get your own
 diary at! contact me older entries newest entry


Long Distance Runaround
Absolutely Right
Kiss And Say Goodbye
The Tube
Never Surrender

Things & Stuff


Daily Reads

Neal Boortz - Neal's Nuze
Mark Evanier
James Hudnall
Anonymous Speaks

Repaired Cat
says thank you.

Original Set-Up,
Maintenance, and
HTML Goddess:
Brin-Marie McLaughlin

Subsequent Tweaks:
Dave Marron

Could it be...SATAN??? [Or, "Money (That's What They Want)"]

2006-06-07 - 9:20 a.m.

Hope you all made it through 6/6/06 yesterday.

Just took a quick glance through my newspaper and it looks like there were no evil cults arrested, no vandalism related to the date...nothing.

Maybe they were all out voting.


Speaking of looks like California's Prop. 82 has been defeated. This was the Preschool For All initiative, put forth by Rob Reiner. It would have added a tax to folks making over $400k a year and used the money to start a program for state-run preschools.

I'm glad it failed, and I'll tell you why.

Firstly, California's state tax rates are already amongst the highest in the nation. Folks who make a lot of money also spend it. If the taxes take it away - and if it's substantial - then the "rich" will simply move to a less tax-intensive state, like Nevada. Nevada has NO personal state income tax.

Second, the definition of "rich" keeps getting lower and lower. I remember when "rich" means "millions". Now you're rich if you make $400k? What's next? What if the definition changes to $250k? Or $100k?

Third, there was a study that said something like 66% of kids already attend or did attend preschool. This initiative would have raised that number a whopping 4%.

Fourth, it would have started yet another bureaucracy. We have enough of THAT, thank you. Said bureaucracy would also decide which existing preschools would be eligible for funds. All existing preschools would have to have ACCREDITED LICENSED teachers. Which would, of course, raise the cost of preschool and make it a little more out-of-reach.

Fifth, California is already leaking red ink. Can we please STOP SPENDING before we start something new?

Lastly, the money was supposed to go to this fine cause. Since when have politicians been able to keep their hands to themselves? They took money that was supposed to go to infrastructure and road maintenence and diverted it to pet projects. Now we need repairs and the funds aren't there. So what do they do? Raise taxes.

After all, it's not THEIR money.


Okay. Enough of that. Rant over.

Be seeing you.


1 comments so far

John - 2006-06-07 15:09:27 -
Nope; not a rant. It's a sensible analysis! -- And I agree 100% !


Previous - Next - Leave A Note - Random

about me - read my profile! read other DiaryLand diaries! recommend my diary to a friend! Get
 your own fun + free diary at!

THE LEGAL STUFF: All content on this site that was created by me is copyright 2006-2011 Dave Marron. This diary features the sole opinions and experiences of one person, namely me, the person who is paying for the space. All incoming email is subject to publication or other distribution by me in whole or in part at my sole discretion. Anything else on these pages including any comments belongs to whoever created it. In the interest of safety and accountability, no anonymous comments will ever be allowed here, ever, for any reason in the entire history of ever. The comments section is part of my paid presence on the web, and is used by my readership to supplement the things I have written here with relevent information in a polite manner. Comments that do not fall in that category are subject to deletion at my whim. Your use of my comments section constitutes the understanding of this statement. If you want to leave a comment and you're not a member of Diaryland, go here. If you are a Diaryland member, here's the login screen. News excerpts used here are for educational purposes and are permitted under the Fair Use Doctrine.